The Supreme Court says that your parent-child association right is protected by the First Amendment as both intimate and expressive association. Close family associations of this nature must receive strict scrutiny protections which your divorce court judge is denying you. This is an abuse of discretion because the judge lacks any discretion to limit this right without first providing full due process protections to you and to your child.
Category: UPLa – Unauthorized Perspective and Legal Analysis of Ron B Palmer
How to Defeat the Argument that Parental Rights are NOT Absolute
When they tell you your rights are not absolute, most people are befuddled at that point, “What do you mean my rights are not absolute? I don’t understand. Why are you taking my rights?” What you have to hit them back with is, “Yes, your honor, I know fully well my rights are not absolute, but my rights are absolutely protected by the First Amendment at strict scrutiny in terms of speech, Association, and worship.
How the BAR association through their UPL committee protects illegal family law practices.
So, let’s look at what the state is doing in regulating its Domestic Relations policy and how it defines that policy. If two parents of a minor child disagree on matters of conscience regarding how that child is to be raised then the state claims that it has parens patriae power to step in and take over that decision making. That’s very questionable and highly unconstitutional on its face, number one, because you have an absolute right to conscience and what you believe to be in your child’s best interest is absolutely protected and the state cannot challenge that or go against that in anyway.